Pre and post-training assessment that shows what changed.
“The session went well” isn't evidence. Run the same test before and after; the gap between the two runs is what you show a sponsor.
One published test, run before and after
Build the assessment once. Start a baseline run before the session and a second run afterwards: identical questions, identical marking, different moment.
- Build and publish the test a single time
- A baseline run, then a post-training run
- Same questions and marking guide across both
Easy to take twice in a day
A pre/post design only works if people sit both halves. Each run opens from a link with no account, autosaves if interrupted, and reads cleanly on a phone.
- No accounts, only a link or a code
- Autosave and resume if they step away
- Works on a phone in the room
Compare the two runs question by question
Each run has its own per-question accuracy. Side by side, a topic at 40% before and 85% after is the one the session moved.
- Per-question accuracy for each run
- Side-by-side reading shows what shifted
- CSV export of both runs for your report
Baseline, train, measure, report
01Run the baseline
Before the session, start the first run and have the group complete it. Expect low scores.
02Deliver the training
Run the session as normal. The assessment stays untouched, so the post-run tests the same material.
03Run it again and compare
Start a second run afterwards, then read the two dashboards side by side and export both.
Frequently asked questions
How do I run the same test twice?
Build and publish the test once, then start two runs of it: a baseline before the training and a second afterwards. Both use the same questions and marking, so the results are directly comparable.
Does TestSetGo calculate the pre/post improvement automatically?
No. There's no automated delta chart overlaying the two runs. Each run has its own dashboard and you compare them side by side, or line up the two CSV exports in a spreadsheet.
Should the pre and post tests be identical?
For a clean comparison, yes. Running the same published test twice keeps questions and marking constant, so any change in scores reflects the training, not a different set of questions.
Can the same people be matched across both runs?
If you collect a verified email or a consistent name in both runs, you can match individuals across the two CSV exports. Otherwise you compare the group's overall and per-question results before and after.
Is it free to try?
Yes. The free plan covers 75 responses a month, enough to trial a pre/post design with a small group. Paid plans add volume for larger or repeated cohorts.
Measure your next session
Build one test, run it before and after, and turn “it went well” into a number you can show.